There are plenty of rules surrounding bikes and what is popular convention. Personally, I think I hate the rule that says you need you stem “slammed” at all costs.
Slammed: stems bottom edge directly in contact with the lowest possible point on the fork steerer. No spacers.
The rationale for many is that this is “Pro”. The irony of that train of thought is that very few Pro riders ride that low in the front, and for them it is always function over form.
Insisting on having a slammed stem, or even contemplating cutting your fork before having your fit completely dialed in, is a very dangerous exercise. Once its gone, it doesnt grow back.
Your bike might look pretty to some while it is leaning against a wall, but if it is too low for your capabilities it can singlehandedly ruin every single dynamic of your bike-fit, and make it the ugliest bike moving. And isnt that what its really about? Riding bikes?
Beware the common conventions, and please apply some logical reasoning behind why you are making choices that effect bike fit.
Other rants in further blogs will refer to the convention of sock height, bar tape colours and chainring choices.
